|
|
|
Editor’s note:
Some brand names become so familiar, it’s easy to forget that they
are often someone’s last name. Most Americans recognize that the
“Ford” in Ford Automotive Company is Henry Ford’s last
name. How about Cimbali? That would be Signor Giuseppe Cimbali. And one
of my favorite craftsmen, Reg Barber, is behind the wonderfully executed
tampers that bear his distinctive RB logo. As an engineer and espresso
equipment admirer, my appreciation of well crafted products extends not
just to the end result, but to those who produce them. In recognition of
the people behind the products, this article offers you a glimpse of
Lino Verna’s workshop where he machines his own espresso gear,
including “bottomless portafilters” like those featured in Perfecting the
Naked Extraction. —HB
First and foremost, I’m a
mechanical engineer. And not just by degree—for better or worse,
it’s in my blood. That’s the primary mission of Verna
Design—mechanical design consulting. However, I frequently like to
make whatever I’ve dreamt up, so I also have some fabrication
experience, primarily in machining and welding.
What does that have to do with coffee? Well, explaining that requires a little background.
Growing up in an Italian household, coffee has always meant espresso—provided you allow the brew from a Moka pot into that definition (hey, this was 20+ years ago!). However, I never got seriously into espresso from a CoffeeGeek perspective until about two years ago.
Admitting to my espresso-loving peers that I’ve owned a variety of Krups machines (and still do) always gets a few chortles. But about two years ago, my wife mentioned the possibility of buying a new espresso machine—a nice espresso machine. That was like waving the red flag in front of a bull. I spent the next three days surfing the Internet, trying to find the right one for me. Finally I found it, the machine the espresso-lover in me had always been longing for—the ECM Giotto. Well, my wife thought differently. Quite differently! She thought I was nuts, and it would be a cold day in hell before we spent a thousand-some dollars on an espresso machine. (Something tells me I’m probably not the first guy to tell this story.)
However, I was not deterred.
![]() |
|
CAD schematic of proposed |
As I thought about the machine, it occurred to me—this isn’t rocket science. I can do this. I’ll make my own!
The first order of business was addressing the question of temperature stability. From experts to serious hobbyists, everyone seemed to agree that controlling the brew temperature was the name of the game. But as I researched further, I found it wasn't easy to quantify. Should I build a thermosyphon like an E61? Or a saturated group like La Marzocco? The list of possibilities went on.
In the end, I decided to use an E61 group as the heart of my espresso machine, but with an added twist that I’ll explain shortly. Since it’s too much work to machine a one-off grouphead, I acquired a stock E61 from Italy as the foundation of my design. But as I said, it started out stock (insert manical, gleeful cackling).
Thanks to the combination of slow European shippers and frequent holidays in Italy, I had to wait four long months for the heavy, gleaming grouphead to arrive. Once I had it, I couldn't wait to disassemble it and figure out the inner workings. Then came the tedious job of measuring each piece and putting it in the CAD system... about 50 hours later, it was digital! Then came the tweaks. Acquiring metric fittings in the U.S. to match the grouphead water inlets wasn’t easy. In fact, even identifying them wasn’t easy. So instead I chose to eliminate the inlet fittings completely by drilling out the entry hole and adding a “trunk” to join the boiler and grouphead directly (shown in blue in the diagram above).
Here’s what came together:
|
Engineer’s Corner |
|---|
|
I’ve read some discussions about the heat capacities of water and brass stating brass has roughly 1/10th the heat capacity of water, and so is relatively insignificant. It should be noted, however, that heat capacity is measured in Joules per gram degrees Centigrade. The per gram part is important. Specifically the density of brass is about 8.5 times that of water, so by volume, the heat capacities of the two substances are much closer. |
The machine worked well. So well in fact, that I gave it to my father. Now that I had done it once I could always make another!
With thermogrease on the temperature sensor in the boiler’s thermo well, the boiler temperature remained steady within 2°C. I didn't have the necessary equipment to measure the brew temperature in the basket during an extraction, but I expect it was even steadier at the puck after passing through the large mass of the grouphead.
Well now I’m working on the next one, but it’s still in the early stages.
Later while surfing CoffeeGeek, I noticed an EspressoFest announcement—I was surprised to read it was happening only minutes from where I work! Later I learned there was an active local coffee community in the North Carolina Triad that met weekly at the same location. Getting together with my fellow enthusiasts quickly became a weekly habit; you can read about our discussions and experiments in the thread Friday Espresso Lab at Counter Culture Coffee.
During one of our espresso labs, the craze about “bottomless portafilters” came up. When I heard they were done with a hole saw, I thought that I could do it more elegantly. So I cut a couple for a few friends using a milling machine, and now look where that got me...
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
The La Spaziale S1
portafilter and its jig on the rotary table. |
The S1 and Rancilio
portafilters, bottomless. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
A batch of Rancilios at the
finished straight-cut stage. |
Here are some of the centers
of the portafilters (for sale—cheap!), |
|
|
|
||
You can see these in action in the how-to article Perfecting the Naked Extraction. To give you an idea of what’s involved in machining one of the above portafilters, I've outlined the steps in the next section.
The machining is done on a small conventional milling machine fitted with a rotary table as follows:
On some portafilters, such as the S1 pictured above, the handle joint of the casting crosses the perimeter of the hole. In that case, the radius tool must be started and stopped at the right position so that it does not cut into the handle joint.
My rotary table is geared such that 90 turns of the hand crank amounts to one rotation of the table. A little math, and you’ll discover that in a batch of 50 portafilters, I turn that crank about 13,500 times.